Back
July 19, 2022

Q&A #19 : Some questions from a good friend

Q 1

What are the mechanism(s) that (largely) bypass the innate immune system upon vaccination with non-replicating vaccines (like mRNA)?  Is this simply because it is a localized injection that doesn't replicate/spread throughout other tissues and organs? Or is this due to additives in mRNA vaccines that prevent innate immune stimulation in order for the mRNA itself to not be degraded before being absorbed into target cells?

A 1

Only replicating virus will present virus-derived (self-mimicking)motifs/patterns (on the surface of infected cells) that can be recognized by innate effector cells (NK cells).

Q 2

Why does C19 vaccination in young children prevent training of their innate immune systems for recognizing other viruses that they would later encounter? I understand how specific Abs can outcompete innate antibodies for a given virus, but why would specific Abs for SARS-CoV-2 Spike outcompete innate antibodies for something like influenza?

A 2

Because innate Abs bind to all glycosylated viruses. Although innate Abs can recognize a myriad of viruses, these very same viruses will require (self-mimicking) pattern recognition by NK cells to be recognized later on. It is through this pattern recognition mechanism that NK cells can be trained more specifically for the pattern presented by a particular virus (but which has reasonable homology with self-mimicking patterns presented by other glycosylated viruses).

Q 3

Can you elaborate on this pattern recognition?

A 3

Innate Abs are typically polyspecific! They recognize self-like surface-expressed sugar patterns. In the case of enveloped glycosylated viruses, those are of course derived from the infected host cells (which provide the envelope of the virus!). This is why these sugar patterns are broadly shared amongst glycosylated viruses.

Support our work
DONATE
Subscribe to our Substack Newsletter

Geert Vanden Bossche received his DVM from the University of Ghent, Belgium, and his PhD degree in Virology from the University of Hohenheim, Germany. He held adjunct faculty appointments at universities in Belgium and Germany. After his career in Academia, Geert joined several vaccine companies (GSK Biologicals, Novartis Vaccines, Solvay Biologicals) to serve various roles in vaccine R&D as well as in late vaccine development.

Geert then moved on to join the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation’s Global Health Discovery team in Seattle (USA) as Senior Program Officer; he then worked with the Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization (GAVI) in Geneva as Senior Ebola Program Manager. At GAVI he tracked efforts to develop an Ebola vaccine. He also represented GAVI in fora with other partners, including WHO, to review progress on the fight against Ebola and to build plans for global pandemic preparedness.

Back in 2015, Geert scrutinized and questioned the safety of the Ebola vaccine that was used in ring vaccination trials conducted by WHO in Guinea. His critical scientific analysis and report on the data published by WHO in the Lancet in 2015 was sent to all international health and regulatory authorities involved in the Ebola vaccination program. After working for GAVI, Geert joined the German Center for Infection Research in Cologne as Head of the Vaccine Development Office. He is at present primarily serving as a Biotech / Vaccine consultant while also conducting his own research on Natural Killer cell-based vaccines.

Email: info@voiceforscienceandsolidarity.org

Recent Posts
December 19, 2024

Dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 in highly C-19 vaccinated populations in a nutshell

Read
December 2, 2024

Are Newly Emerging Saltation Variants the Desperate Harbingers of an Imminent Surge in COVID-19 Case Fatalities in Highly C-19 Vaccinated Populations?

Read
November 23, 2024

Bird Flu Gain-of-Function Study Fueling Vaccine Development, Fears of Human Transmission

Read
Voices for Science and solidarity, © 2023